Redefining Minimalism

Today I read farther down Barbara Brackman’s Historically Modern sidebar than I usually do and found an older post on modern minimalism.

Most of her examples fit what I had considered minimalism, which emphasized big, plain, and simple. However, I was surprised at the Kandinsky she included. Simple shapes, well yes, mostly squares and triangles. But what about those irregular shapes and curves? And it seemed so fussy, compared to the one above and below it.

Better to expand than constrict, perhaps.

I don’t have any photos today, but there are plenty if you follow the link to Brackman’s post.

 

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under design

3 responses to “Redefining Minimalism

  1. dezertsuz

    Like many things, I suppose it can be open to interpretation, but I always think “less is more.” =) My friends call me a minimalist because my house walls are not covered with pictures and I don’t have cabinets full of “stuff.” But I don’t think of myself that way since I know how much junk is everywhere!

  2. I believe Kandinsky was trying to visualize music in these composition paintings. It “looks” like Jazz to me, ha ha!
    Esther

  3. I love Brackman’s new blog posts–and love to read them. I’m thinking she just got sick of the current “moderns” claiming to have invented the form, and decided to bring some education to the party. Bully for her!

Conversation is good, so please join in. I'll reply here if it seems relevant to others, by email, or by visiting your blog.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s